<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Implementing EHRs/EMRs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog</link>
	<description>Implementing Electronic Health Record Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:35:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EHR in Jail: First Night by Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=902&#038;cpage=1#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=902#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; electronics http://qmovingqdwzs.BESTPARTSPLUS.INFO/tag/electronics+Emerson+Station/ : Station...&lt;/strong&gt;

Station...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> electronics <a href="http://qmovingqdwzs.BESTPARTSPLUS.INFO/tag/electronics+Emerson+Station/" rel="nofollow">http://qmovingqdwzs.BESTPARTSPLUS.INFO/tag/electronics+Emerson+Station/</a> : Station&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Station&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HITECH EHR Stimulus: Confusion, Cynicism, and Anger by Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=603&#038;cpage=1#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=603#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>The Regional Extension Center in California has no idea how to get the local community health plans involved in getting their providers on EHR. They need to pass alongg the stimulus money to the local plans so that they can quickly get their small PCPs on EHR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Regional Extension Center in California has no idea how to get the local community health plans involved in getting their providers on EHR. They need to pass alongg the stimulus money to the local plans so that they can quickly get their small PCPs on EHR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using NextGen: Thin Client vs. Fat Client by Dan Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=146&#038;cpage=1#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=146#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>We are a large medical office using a different EHR software but have basically the same network design using windows terminal serivces.  For 10 years I have been a BIG fan of thin client models. Through my recent experience I have been forced to relook at the fat client installation.  10 years ago in our area there was no such thing as metro-e connections right?  I mention to bring out the bandwidth that is currently available may change things for us.  We have replaced all of our laptops and pc&#039;s because of a rollout of a new billing system.  All of our users have new pc&#039;s or laptops and at least 10Meg lines to their sites, many 50meg and some 100meg.  We now have fiber modules connecting our switches, upgraded our ebay special hubs to CISCO stuff.  In short the overhaul of our network for other reasons now is making the fat client feasible for us.  The doctors love it.  One less password, a lot better performance, and fewer printers to have to scroll through.

The down sides:
Managing updates
Security
Error messages

are being well managed through pushing updates.  The down side of SQL errors if there is a disruption has happened, but rarley.  We have left the terminal servers up so that any of the doctors that prefer the RDP connection to the server still can use it.  Its been about a month and I am cautiously optimistic this may be a better approach for us.  At the end of the day, the best solution depends on the quality of the network, the tolerance of the software and users to get the SQL errors and specific concerns of the physicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are a large medical office using a different EHR software but have basically the same network design using windows terminal serivces.  For 10 years I have been a BIG fan of thin client models. Through my recent experience I have been forced to relook at the fat client installation.  10 years ago in our area there was no such thing as metro-e connections right?  I mention to bring out the bandwidth that is currently available may change things for us.  We have replaced all of our laptops and pc&#8217;s because of a rollout of a new billing system.  All of our users have new pc&#8217;s or laptops and at least 10Meg lines to their sites, many 50meg and some 100meg.  We now have fiber modules connecting our switches, upgraded our ebay special hubs to CISCO stuff.  In short the overhaul of our network for other reasons now is making the fat client feasible for us.  The doctors love it.  One less password, a lot better performance, and fewer printers to have to scroll through.</p>
<p>The down sides:<br />
Managing updates<br />
Security<br />
Error messages</p>
<p>are being well managed through pushing updates.  The down side of SQL errors if there is a disruption has happened, but rarley.  We have left the terminal servers up so that any of the doctors that prefer the RDP connection to the server still can use it.  Its been about a month and I am cautiously optimistic this may be a better approach for us.  At the end of the day, the best solution depends on the quality of the network, the tolerance of the software and users to get the SQL errors and specific concerns of the physicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on EMRs by EMR</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=400&#038;cpage=1#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>EMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=400#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>Murray - when I read your post, I couldn&#039;t agree more - emr&#039;s need to be built to conform to the individual physician.

This can be done and there are resellers who do just that - they take the physician&#039;s forms and customize the templates according to how the physician typically works thru a patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray &#8211; when I read your post, I couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; emr&#8217;s need to be built to conform to the individual physician.</p>
<p>This can be done and there are resellers who do just that &#8211; they take the physician&#8217;s forms and customize the templates according to how the physician typically works thru a patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What makes an EMR 2.0? by Andrew Eriksen</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=454&#038;cpage=1#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eriksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=454#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>I would agree that PracticeFusion is on its way to achieving EMR 2.0 but would also say that the next hurdles it must overcome are the real dinosaurs.  As a free system they have limited funding available to make the necessary investments into competing with the bigger players.  With the cash infusion from salesforce.com, they have been able to invest some more money into development but it seems to me that the money should be running out soon.  I have recently started working with another ad supported Free EMR called Mitochon and wrote a review about it on my website.  I believe that they are actually closer than pf to achieving the &quot;EMR 2.0&quot; classification.  They have something called Mconnect that sets them apart from other companies, including the big players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that PracticeFusion is on its way to achieving EMR 2.0 but would also say that the next hurdles it must overcome are the real dinosaurs.  As a free system they have limited funding available to make the necessary investments into competing with the bigger players.  With the cash infusion from salesforce.com, they have been able to invest some more money into development but it seems to me that the money should be running out soon.  I have recently started working with another ad supported Free EMR called Mitochon and wrote a review about it on my website.  I believe that they are actually closer than pf to achieving the &#8220;EMR 2.0&#8243; classification.  They have something called Mconnect that sets them apart from other companies, including the big players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama: 100% EMR in 5 Years by Cheryl Clymens, Medical Transcriptionist</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=498&#038;cpage=1#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Clymens, Medical Transcriptionist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=498#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>I am one of the many medical transcriptionists who will lose their job thanks to government forced EMR. I love what I do and do my job well.  I don&#039;t appreciate being forced out of my job by the government.  I catch mistakes on a daily basis made by physicians who get lazy in their dictation so I beg to differ on how accurate EMR will be when the same physicians are putting that info into it.  After years in the field and doing a great job at what I do I am rewarded with having to look for a new career and taking a pay cut.  And the job market is just so grand right now as we all know hopefully I won&#039;t end up on the unemployment line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the many medical transcriptionists who will lose their job thanks to government forced EMR. I love what I do and do my job well.  I don&#8217;t appreciate being forced out of my job by the government.  I catch mistakes on a daily basis made by physicians who get lazy in their dictation so I beg to differ on how accurate EMR will be when the same physicians are putting that info into it.  After years in the field and doing a great job at what I do I am rewarded with having to look for a new career and taking a pay cut.  And the job market is just so grand right now as we all know hopefully I won&#8217;t end up on the unemployment line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EMR 2.0 Video by AllScripts by Allscripts Online Training</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=486&#038;cpage=1#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Allscripts Online Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=486#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for Great info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for Great info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HIMSS Day 1: Dennis Quaid and Wrap-up by Who’s Blogging HIMSS 09? &#124; ArticlesHealth.Net</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=733&#038;cpage=1#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Who’s Blogging HIMSS 09? &#124; ArticlesHealth.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=733#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>[...] from the Healthycare Blog Mr Histalk (and Inga) Pharm Aid Jane Sarasohn-Kahn from Healthy Populi Ben from TempDev Business Technology Blog John from Chilmark Research Ben Mehling from Medsphere John Sharp Neil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the Healthycare Blog Mr Histalk (and Inga) Pharm Aid Jane Sarasohn-Kahn from Healthy Populi Ben from TempDev Business Technology Blog John from Chilmark Research Ben Mehling from Medsphere John Sharp Neil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EHR/EMR HITECH Stimulus White Paper by Marshall Maglothin</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=598&#038;cpage=1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Maglothin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=598#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>The first two HITECH priority grant programs, funded through the Recovery Act, support the national implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) initiative.

Approximately $598 million is being made available through the Health Information Technology Extension Program (Extension Program), to ensure that comprehensive support is available to health technology users.

Under the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program $564 million will be awarded to support efforts to achieve widespread and sustainable health information exchange (HIE) within and among States through the meaningful use of certified Electronic Health Records.

State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program
The State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program will help States and Qualified State Designated Entities (SDEs) to develop or align the necessary policies, procedures and network systems to assist electronic information exchange within and across states, and ultimately throughout the health care system. A key to this program’s overall success will be technical, legal and financial support for information exchanges across health care providers. 

The Extension Program will provide grants for the establishment of Regional Health Information Technology Extension Centers (Regional Centers) that will offer technical assistance, guidance and information on Electronic Health Records best practices. These estimated 70 (or more) Regional Centers each will serve a defined geographic area. The Regional Centers will support at least 100,000 primary care providers, (and receive $5,000 for EACH PROVIDER that is successful at “meaningful use”) through participating non-profit organizations, in achieving meaningful use of EHRs and enabling nationwide health information exchange with direct, individualized and on-site technical assistance in:
    Selecting a certified EHR product that offers best value for the providers’ needs;
    Achieving effective implementation of a certified EHR product;  
    Enhancing clinical and administrative workflows to optimally leverage an EHR system’s potential to improve quality and value of care, including patient experience as well as outcome of care; and,
    Observing and complying with applicable legal, regulatory, professional and ethical requirements to protect the integrity, privacy and security of patients’ health information.

The Extension Program will also establish a national Health Information Technology Research Center (HITRC), funded separately, which will gather relevant information on effective practices from a wide variety of sources across the country and help the Regional Centers collaborate with one another and with relevant stakeholders to identify and share best practices in EHR adoption, effective use, and provider support.

Grants under the Extension Program will be awarded on a rolling basis with an expected 20 grants awarded in the first quarter of FY2010, another 25 in the third quarter and the remaining awards in the fourth quarter of FY2010. The initial funding includes approximately $598 million to ensure that comprehensive support is available to providers under the Extension Program beginning early in FY2010, with an additional $45 million available for years 3 and 4 of the program. Federal support continues for four years, after which the program is expected to be self-sustaining. Of the total federal investment in this program, about $50 million is dedicated to establishing the national HITRC, and $643 million is devoted to the Regional Centers.

The law requires that Regional Centers be affiliated with a U.S.-based, nonprofit institution or organization, or an entity thereof, that applies for and is awarded funding under the Extension Program. The program anticipates that potential applicants will represent various types of nonprofit organizations and institutions with established support and recognition within the local communities they propose to serve.

The performance of each Regional Center will be evaluated every two years by a HHS-appointed panel of private experts, none of whom are associated with the center being evaluated. Continued support for the Regional Center after the conclusion of the second year of performance will be contingent on the panel’s evaluation being, on the whole, positive and on HHS’ determination that such continued federal support for the center is in the best interest of the program.

The Regional Centers will focus their most intensive technical assistance on clinicians (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) furnishing primary-care services, with a particular emphasis on individual and small group practices (fewer than 10 clinicians with prescriptive privileges). Clinicians in such practices deliver the majority of primary care services, but have the lowest rates of adoption of EHR systems, and the least access to resources to help them implement, use and maintain such systems. Regional Centers will also focus intensive technical assistance on clinicians providing primary care in public and critical access hospitals, community health centers, and in other settings that predominantly serve uninsured, underinsured, and medically underserved populations.


The Extension Program expects all Regional Centers to be operating at full capacity by the end of December 2010. In addition, it is expected that by the end of December 2012, the Regional Centers will be largely self-sustaining and their need for continued federal support in the remaining two years of the program will be minimal.

Additional information is available at http://healthit.hhs.gov/extensionprogram</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first two HITECH priority grant programs, funded through the Recovery Act, support the national implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) initiative.</p>
<p>Approximately $598 million is being made available through the Health Information Technology Extension Program (Extension Program), to ensure that comprehensive support is available to health technology users.</p>
<p>Under the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program $564 million will be awarded to support efforts to achieve widespread and sustainable health information exchange (HIE) within and among States through the meaningful use of certified Electronic Health Records.</p>
<p>State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program<br />
The State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program will help States and Qualified State Designated Entities (SDEs) to develop or align the necessary policies, procedures and network systems to assist electronic information exchange within and across states, and ultimately throughout the health care system. A key to this program’s overall success will be technical, legal and financial support for information exchanges across health care providers. </p>
<p>The Extension Program will provide grants for the establishment of Regional Health Information Technology Extension Centers (Regional Centers) that will offer technical assistance, guidance and information on Electronic Health Records best practices. These estimated 70 (or more) Regional Centers each will serve a defined geographic area. The Regional Centers will support at least 100,000 primary care providers, (and receive $5,000 for EACH PROVIDER that is successful at “meaningful use”) through participating non-profit organizations, in achieving meaningful use of EHRs and enabling nationwide health information exchange with direct, individualized and on-site technical assistance in:<br />
    Selecting a certified EHR product that offers best value for the providers’ needs;<br />
    Achieving effective implementation of a certified EHR product;<br />
    Enhancing clinical and administrative workflows to optimally leverage an EHR system’s potential to improve quality and value of care, including patient experience as well as outcome of care; and,<br />
    Observing and complying with applicable legal, regulatory, professional and ethical requirements to protect the integrity, privacy and security of patients’ health information.</p>
<p>The Extension Program will also establish a national Health Information Technology Research Center (HITRC), funded separately, which will gather relevant information on effective practices from a wide variety of sources across the country and help the Regional Centers collaborate with one another and with relevant stakeholders to identify and share best practices in EHR adoption, effective use, and provider support.</p>
<p>Grants under the Extension Program will be awarded on a rolling basis with an expected 20 grants awarded in the first quarter of FY2010, another 25 in the third quarter and the remaining awards in the fourth quarter of FY2010. The initial funding includes approximately $598 million to ensure that comprehensive support is available to providers under the Extension Program beginning early in FY2010, with an additional $45 million available for years 3 and 4 of the program. Federal support continues for four years, after which the program is expected to be self-sustaining. Of the total federal investment in this program, about $50 million is dedicated to establishing the national HITRC, and $643 million is devoted to the Regional Centers.</p>
<p>The law requires that Regional Centers be affiliated with a U.S.-based, nonprofit institution or organization, or an entity thereof, that applies for and is awarded funding under the Extension Program. The program anticipates that potential applicants will represent various types of nonprofit organizations and institutions with established support and recognition within the local communities they propose to serve.</p>
<p>The performance of each Regional Center will be evaluated every two years by a HHS-appointed panel of private experts, none of whom are associated with the center being evaluated. Continued support for the Regional Center after the conclusion of the second year of performance will be contingent on the panel’s evaluation being, on the whole, positive and on HHS’ determination that such continued federal support for the center is in the best interest of the program.</p>
<p>The Regional Centers will focus their most intensive technical assistance on clinicians (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) furnishing primary-care services, with a particular emphasis on individual and small group practices (fewer than 10 clinicians with prescriptive privileges). Clinicians in such practices deliver the majority of primary care services, but have the lowest rates of adoption of EHR systems, and the least access to resources to help them implement, use and maintain such systems. Regional Centers will also focus intensive technical assistance on clinicians providing primary care in public and critical access hospitals, community health centers, and in other settings that predominantly serve uninsured, underinsured, and medically underserved populations.</p>
<p>The Extension Program expects all Regional Centers to be operating at full capacity by the end of December 2010. In addition, it is expected that by the end of December 2012, the Regional Centers will be largely self-sustaining and their need for continued federal support in the remaining two years of the program will be minimal.</p>
<p>Additional information is available at <a href="http://healthit.hhs.gov/extensionprogram" rel="nofollow">http://healthit.hhs.gov/extensionprogram</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Flu Shot Package Updated for H1N1 by Brent Meador</title>
		<link>http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=916&#038;cpage=1#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Meador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tempdev.net/blog/?p=916#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested in the FLU template.

Thanks,  Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in the FLU template.</p>
<p>Thanks,  Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
